Abstract. This paper uses a social model to investigate the complex
area of identity in the British Army with special reference
to the Infantry at unit level. The model, created in
earlier research, specifically to examine unit-level organizational culture in the
British Army, conceptualizes four different shared bodies of ideas, rules
and conventions of behaviour which inform groups of people or
individuals how to organize and conduct themselves vis-à-vis each other.
Various axes of identity are described, based on these four
‘social structures’, revealing a multi-faceted and dynamic set of social
issues. This investigation confirms that the model is a useful
tool with which to examine issues of identity entirely within
units of the British Army, but where these issues connect
strongly with aspects or people outside the unit boundary it
is a less appropriate tool. Even so, the model can
be useful in providing insights into the origins of the
elements that contribute to constructions by unit members of outsiders
as ‘the other’. This investigation implies that the model may
be of use in systems engineering for British Army equipment
projects (particularly with respect to the new Human Factors Integration
Domain ‘Organizational and Social’), and in planning organizational change in
the British Army.
Related topics:
military capability, command systems
View first page of "Kirke:The Transferable ‘We’: Axes of Identity for the British Infantry Soldier"
Papers by Kirke
Register for the free
to receive a list of papers for each issue as it is released.
|
|